A lateral Thinking Question a week

[over and out]

i stick with my reply to your answer :P

[Caru y Nos]

Quote:

Originally Posted by messed_up_soul

CHEAT!!!

Just cos my mind holds more historically relevant information than yours. I think Churchill is the only priminister to be voted back in after been voted after power. And i'm above cheating!!! (i could go further into it if you like)

[over and out]

no thanks i am a cheat so read the full story there lol :P

[Schleier von Dunst]

k I'll start from the beginning.

Chloe cheats because she knows which website I often use and copies and pastes the answer here. She's a big cheat so that's why I found new sites haha Chloe!!!

I'm not sure whether to believe the other answer was a cheat. Winston Churchill was the only Prime Minister to be voted in twice, and I don't know if the info was researched or known. So...I'll overlook it...

[Caru y Nos]

It was known, from GCSE History. He took over after Neville Chamberlain (sp?) because of his incompitance and "peace in our time" rubbish; which left Britain with 6 months to prepare for war, in comparison to Goerring's 6 years of preparing the weimar republic's economy for war.

The conservatives were voted out after the war. People believed that Labour was the better choice party to tackle the five giants (which i could never remember). By 1951, the people were fed up of rationing and the last thing to come off rationing was bacon and pork (me thinks); so conservatives were voted back in. If my memory of the hurried finishing of the sylabus is correct, then Churchill died and was buried as if he were royalty. (i'm sketchy on this section of the history). Churchill had origionally been in the Liberal party, but joined the conservatives after the fall of Lloyd-George, the first Welsh priminister; even though he technically wasn't welsh. (i sat my exams last year, so am pretty sketchy on details. AS takes precedence over old GCSE work)

Furthermore, if anyone would wish to question if i cheat. Rest assured, cheating is firmly beneath me, i would not stoop to such a level unless that was my original intention. Which it is NOT!!

There, i'm done ;] LOL :P
(just to make things clear)

[Schleier von Dunst]

Well said I have to say. Nice to know someone's above cheating ( chloe) though I have to say some of the spellings through the reply were absolutely fantastic... made fun reading...

I'll post a new question soon...

[over and out]

post it after half two on sunday sarah please cos i work
although cant guarentee ill be around at all

[Schleier von Dunst]

lol ok

[Schleier von Dunst]

A king has 2 sons, both born at the same time. The king, unable to chose who will take the throne when he dies, tells his sons there will be a challenge to see who will be king. The king says that each prince must ride horseback to the river and back. Who ever's horse is the last to return will be king. the first son mounts right away and gallops full speed towards the river. The king knows instantly that the first son will be king. How?

Thanks for the PM
this ones for chloe

[over and out]

they were conjoined twins

[Caru y Nos]

if they were conjoined, then the first one will be the first back; so he'd lose.
The last horse back wins, i presume the first one isn't riding a horse!?
idk, i'm stumped

[Schleier von Dunst]

Both wrong

[Caru y Nos]

the horse is lame!!!!

[Caru y Nos]

only one survived birth? its a play on words, the 'first': they were born at the same time.
Only one set off on horseback, the first was the last!!!

[Schleier von Dunst]

thats wrong as well

[Caru y Nos]

Wrong direction and river?

[Schleier von Dunst]

Nope.

[Caru y Nos]

There is no river and its testing there persistance? The first is the most persistant!?

[Schleier von Dunst]

Nope.

[over and out]

the second is a transexual so they wud then be counted as princess and cud therefore never be king