|
|
 |
|
06-02-2008, 09:07 PM
|
#1
|
|
Chin up!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Linthorpe UK
I am currently: 
|
Noticed there was Phsychology students here..
Well, I'm doing coursework on the effects of chunking on STM, except I can't really find any previous studies and I'm already behind, can anybody help?
Muchly appreciated
Love Toni
xxx
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 09:20 PM
|
#3
|
|
Forum Mod.
Join Date: Oct 2005
I am currently: 
|
If it's the type of thing you're looking for, in the Levels of Processing theory, organistation is one of the categories, and to support thet Mandler (1967) did a study whereby he asked participants to sort 52 cards with prictures on them into piles using categories. They were then given an unexpected free recall test and the recall was poorest wuth those using less categories.
Supporting the fact that organisation is a necessary condition in memory but also that chunking the information into easy to remember categories was useful too.
No idea if that helps in the slightest.
But cest la vie.
|
"Be nice. Think happy thoughts. Champion silver linings. Love all things (not just cute things like babies and kittens) & when you do love - love like they do in power ballads (you know like on a cliff with the wind in your hair and your eyes shut, knowing you'll never know love like this). Watch out for dog poo. Smile at people - even grumpy ones. Remember anything is possible & whatever you do always try to look on the bright side."
|
|
|
|
06-02-2008, 10:32 PM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
I am currently: 
|
start off with miller et al. he did quite a lot of stuff on STM and
7 +/-2 chunking thing. google it. and look for journels and psychology books. if your scottish i recommond psychology for higher
or complete psychology by davey its the course text for first year BSc psychology which im currently sitting
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-02-2008, 10:41 PM
|
#5
|
|
Chin up!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Linthorpe UK
I am currently: 
|
Thanks a lot :) You're all a big help.
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-02-2008, 11:20 PM
|
#6
|
|
|
*cracks out old A/s text book*, i shall return!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-02-2008, 11:26 PM
|
#7
|
|
|
hmm i dont have any specific studies in my old text book but it does mention it. emphasis is on Miller (1956) - mentioned above. not much at all really.
wikipedia is your friend. i searched chunking and got this- ' Karl Lashley, way back in 1951, in his classic paper on serial order (Lashley, 1951) argued that the sequential responses that appear to be organized in linear and flat fashion concealed an underlying hierarchical structure. This was demonstrated in motor control by Rosenbaum et al (1983).'
possibly some names to look into.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16-02-2008, 08:12 PM
|
#10
|
|
I'll let you **** my soul, for a hit of that glow
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
I am currently: 
|
Joseph Jacobs (1887), Miller et al (1956), Herb Simon (1974)
:D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Members Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
Censor is ON
|
|
|
Sea Pink Aroma
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:11 PM.
|
|