signature sizes.

Snow White. · 14-07-2010, 07:04 AM

Anyone else noticing some really big signature pics/signatures around again?

I know there was a switch in servers and this messed up the automated "this picture is too big resize it yo!" message people got.

Is anyone finding sig sizes a problem at the moment?

sajhfuahuefghaeg · 14-07-2010, 07:05 AM

I haven't noticed any HUGE ones. I've PM'd about a few though a while back.

akita · 14-07-2010, 07:42 AM

I've seen a few big ones but they don't bother me.

Amberjade! · 14-07-2010, 10:53 AM

I havent noticed any, Other than mine, i think the picture is stupid big, although i love my dog, however its annoying me, and im not the brightest, id love to know how to re-size it,

Schleier von Dunst · 14-07-2010, 06:14 PM

Can't say I've noticed but I'll look out.

ferretmonster · 14-07-2010, 06:21 PM

i have to say ive only ever really used one other forum before and pics in sigs weren't allowed so everyones sig is huge to me

Schleier von Dunst · 14-07-2010, 06:42 PM

ah fair enough

We have a certain size allowed, but I can't remember what it is atm. I know we're only allowed 10 lines of text

Schleier von Dunst · 14-07-2010, 11:38 PM

yeah, go for it

Schleier von Dunst · 15-07-2010, 12:04 AM

Awesome

Snow White. · 15-07-2010, 12:56 AM

****ing love that signature!

ebec11 · 15-07-2010, 06:07 AM

I was so worried about mine being too large, but it seems alright compared to others here, so...

Stellata · 15-07-2010, 07:53 AM

So many people on this thread have large sig pics!

I no longer have dial up, so it's not a problem in that respect. But I do find it distracting from the content of the posts.

Schleier von Dunst · 15-07-2010, 09:14 AM

Do you feel that pictures themselves in sigs are not a good idea? This isn't meant as a jab as you, I'm just interested

The Hierophant · 15-07-2010, 11:20 AM

i think some sig pics are a bit depressing.

griddlebone · 15-07-2010, 12:01 PM

I think some are depressing too!xx

Stellata · 15-07-2010, 12:08 PM

I always thoughts av.s were for pictures, sigs. were for words.
But I know I'm kinda old fashioned!
However... It's like when you display a piece of art/children's writing. [Ex teacher in me, ha!] The frame/surround should complement the work, not distract from it.
But I don't want this to sound dictatorial, just a comment/belief. :)

Dreaming. · 15-07-2010, 02:25 PM

Wasn't it a maximum of 300 by 500 for the signature? Or is that a different website and I've just completely made that up? Either way, there are some ridiculously large signatures out there!

Caru y Nos · 15-07-2010, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aimee in Wonderland

Anyone else noticing some really big signature pics/signatures around again?

I didn't, until:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daemon.

THIS SIGNATURE IS HUGE sig? :D

yourockmysocks · 15-07-2010, 04:26 PM

This is why I have signatures permanently blocked, it's distracting from the content of posts.

(oh and I'm a dirt hypocrite who has a signature regardless...

)

Schleier von Dunst · 15-07-2010, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stellata

I always thoughts av.s were for pictures, sigs. were for words.
But I know I'm kinda old fashioned!
However... It's like when you display a piece of art/children's writing. [Ex teacher in me, ha!] The frame/surround should complement the work, not distract from it.
But I don't want this to sound dictatorial, just a comment/belief. :)

That's quite a good point actually, particularly from a teacher's point of view