|
|
 |
|
09-04-2008, 12:15 PM
|
#2
|
|
dizzy dyke
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: E.Sussex
|
No I don't think so.
17/18 years old is not a child. A young man/Teenager but not classed as a child I wouldn't say.
And not nessacarily means the flirter is gay either. May be but may also be just playing about and that isn't wrong.
|
I want to kiss the bottom of the ocean before I burst through its surface into the sunlight, otherwise I will always be wondering about what was left unseen at the bottom
i'm tired of chasing my dreams.
i'm just gonna ask where they're going,
and hook up with them later.
Previously Kelpie
|
|
|
|
|
09-04-2008, 12:17 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
I am currently: 
|
Certainly doesn't make him a paedophile.
21 and 17 are both old enough to be consensual.
Doesn't necessarily make him gay either, boys piss about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-04-2008, 12:53 PM
|
#6
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Kelpie
No I don't think so.
17/18 years old is not a child. A young man/Teenager but not classed as a child I wouldn't say.
And not nessacarily means the flirter is gay either. May be but may also be just playing about and that isn't wrong.
true true.. well they could of just been messing about, as guys do
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-04-2008, 12:54 PM
|
#7
|
|
|
Originally Posted by BeautyFiend
Certainly doesn't make him a paedophile.
21 and 17 are both old enough to be consensual.
Doesn't necessarily make him gay either, boys piss about.
i agree.. but sumtimes boys piss around too much, where they go to far with it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-04-2008, 12:56 PM
|
#8
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Raven
no. it wouldnt make him a paedophile where i come from as the age of consent is 16 - plus flirting is a very grey area, i wouldnt call someone a paedophile for merely flirting with someone who was underage.
it also doesnt make someone gay having a bit of harmless fun.
i have actuallyslept with another woman - but i am not homosexual. in fact im straight. it was experimental.
i suppose its aight, as they call it abit of fun, but it isnt fun, for the one being accused of being a peadophile/homsexual ( which is wat the 17/18 is accusing the 21 guy of)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-04-2008, 12:56 PM
|
#9
|
|
|
Originally Posted by emu
i agree...there's only a few years age difference and if he was just joking then it doesn't mean anything about whether he's homosexual or not.
true, i think they can take too far sumtimes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-04-2008, 01:18 PM
|
#10
|
|
|
Originally Posted by Night Nurse
It's just flirting. Flirting is fun and harmless.
Paedophiles are attracted to people who are pre-pubescent, or at under the legal age. A 21 year old who is interested in a 17 year old is unlikely to be a paedophile.
They might be gay, they might not be. Some people flirt with everybody.
If the 17 year old felt uncomfortable with it he should have said something at the time. For future encounters, he should stop it as soon as the conversation turns flirty.
true true..
oh i see wat u saying, so are peadophiles attracted to like say for example 8- 10 years old. that type of age?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Members Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
Censor is ON
|
|
|
Sea Pink Aroma
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 AM.
|
|
