View Single Post
Old 11-07-2012, 11:51 PM   #22
effervescence
tired
 
effervescence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
I am currently:

Quote:
Originally Posted by griddlebone View Post
I understand its your point, but what Im saying is that yes I think it is fair that someone has the right to have their own thread closed regardless of whether other people use it for support.

Surely its unfair to deny someone the right to choose whether their thread is closed or not?As the creator of it it should be their choice, in my opinion.
I agree with this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iateallthepies View Post
The only sensible thing I can say right now is that perhaps after a thread has taken off to a certain point such as 1000 with more than x members posting, it becomes a universal thread- 'owned' for want of a better word by the regular posters. Obviously if its about someones personal stuff ie My Uni Stuff that is totally different to the 'lets all post about uni stuff'.
I understand your point and I think the others have as well. But I disagree that a thread becomes owned by the public, as such, just because it's popular. I think that this would be impossible to use in practice and would only lead to arguments and drama over what happens when threads like this have issues and want to be closed etc. I really think that the creator of the thread has to retain the ownership of it - this means it's always clear to everyone.



Even as the stone of the fruit must break
that its heart may stand in the sun,
so must you know pain.

There are only two ways in which one can live their life. One is as though nothing is a miracle, the other is as though everything is.


effervescence is offline   Reply With Quote