It all looks a bit dodgy to me. The thing I can't understand is why they would do it - Aimee you said about Munchausen Syndrome but surely if either/both of them had that then a) it would affect their other children as well, and b) it would be something that could be detected by some kind of psychological testing? I don't know much about Munchausen Syndrome but surely as with other mental diseases it should be able to be diagnosed?
Do the police genuinely believe that she is guilty? The upgrading of her status from witness to 'arguida' or suspect mainly means in physical terms that they are able to ask her questions whilst she has a lawyer there, and she has the right to remain silent - whereas as a witness she is required to answer all questions.
It all sounds really dodgy though what with their conflicting statements and such.
Oh, and Cam, I think the blood was analysed by a forensics lab back in England and found to be Maddie's, although saying that how would they know it was Maddie's blood if they'd never had a blood sample from her before she went missing?
|