Originally Posted by
The One Who
I am completely against vigilantism, I see it as no different to any other type of crime.
I said that is "sometimes" necessary. I am not condoling it in ALL circumstances. But under circumstances such as this where there is no doubt as to who committed the crime, then yes, I think it is acceptable. The "law" did not do their job in this case, 16yrs for the LIFE of a child? That can't be right in anybody's book. It's job is supposed to bring justice to this God foresaken country but they can't seem to do that anymore. What would your opinion be if they had only gotten 2yrs for this crime? Or it had been decided that they HAD done it, without a doubt, but had escaped conviction due to their age?